Stats – Sunrisers' first successful 200+ chase

Yuzvendra Chahal, meanwhile, one wicket away from displacing Dwayne Bravo at the top of the IPL’s wicket charts

Sampath Bandarupalli07-May-20231 – In chasing 215 against Rajasthan Royals, Sunrisers Hyderabad successfully chased down a target of 200-plus for the first time in the IPL. Their previous highest successful chase was 199, also against the Rajasthan Royals in 2019 in Hyderabad.215 – The target chased by Sunrisers – the joint-third-highest chase in IPL history. It is also the highest chase by any team against Rajasthan Royals, surpassing Mumbai Indians’ 213-run chase at the Wankhede last week.41 – Runs needed by Sunrisers at the start of the 19th over. Only three teams in men’s T20s have successfully chased more runs in the last two overs (where ball-by-ball data is available). Forty-three runs are the joint-highest, chased by Chennai Super Kings against the Royal Challengers Bangalore in IPL 2012, Sussex versus Gloucestershire in the 2015 T20 Blast, and Kolkata Knight Riders against Gujarat Titans earlier this year.6 – Number of 200-plus targets successfully chased in IPL 2023, the most in a T20 tournament. The previous highest was five successful 200-plus chases in the T20 Blast in 2017.7 – Balls faced by Glenn Phillips for his 25. It is the least involvement for a player in an IPL match to win the Player-of-the-Match award. The previous lowest was Nuwan Kulasekara, who bowled 12 balls during his award-winning effort for Super Kings in 2012 against Pune Warriors.

183 – Wickets for Yuzvendra Chahal in the IPL after his four-wicket haul against Sunrisers. He is now the joint-highest wicket-taker in the league history, alongside Dwayne Bravo.207 – Sunrisers’ total according to ESPNcricinfo’s Luck Index, had Obed McCoy completed the catch of Abdul Samad on the first ball of the 20th over. The dropped chance cost Royals ten runs, including the two runs taken on the missed attempt.217-6 – Sunrisers’ total in Jaipur, the highest by any team in the IPL at the Sawai Mansingh Stadium. No team had breached the 200-run mark in the IPL here prior to this season. Royals have already done so twice this year – 202 for 5 against Super Kings and 214 for 2 today.

Marsh's opening heroics compound questions for Australia

With Marsh, Warner and Head in the mix, Australia face a problem of plenty in the opening department

Andrew McGlashan23-Mar-20233:04

Marsh a long term opener? Warner in the middle order?

Mitchell Marsh finding a new spot in the batting order in a World Cup year. We’ve been here before. His success opening against India, initially in place of the injured David Warner, mirrored his rise to No. 3 in T20I side during 2021 and was the most interesting subplot to emerge from Australia’s impressive 2-1 series win.When Warner returned for the decider in Chennai it was he who moved down the order, not opening in an ODI for just the second time in his 142-match career. Marsh again shone with a run-a-ball 47, which became Australia’s top score in what proved a match-winning total borne from a collective team effort.Australia had said all along that they would experiment in this series with an eye on formulating plans ahead of the ODI World Cup in October. However, of the questions that could have been posed, whether Warner should open the batting was probably not one of them. It remains likely he will be back in that position later in the year, but it could now be a ticklish decision for the selectors: Marsh is well suited to exploiting the fielding restrictions while Travis Head’s best position is also opening.Related

Ellis in Wonderland – 'I have to pinch myself sometimes when I wear the Australia colours'

Zampa and Co stifle India to take series 2-1

India's atypical attack mode fails against Australia's spinners

“I certainly enjoyed the opportunity to open the batting,” Marsh said after being named Player of the Series. “But as a group we spoke before the first game that this really the start of our campaign for the World Cup and certain guys are going to bat in different positions at times and it’s really important we have a squad mentality. With Davey out for the first couple of games it was my opportunity. He’s been an incredible player for Australia for a long time and probably one of the best ODI openers ever so I’m sure he’ll slot back in at some stage but think it’s really important that we are all flexible and it was nice to perform for the team.”Marcus Stoinis: new-ball bowlerMarsh was unable to bowl in this series as he continues to take a cautious approach after the ankle surgery he underwent in November. It meant a greater role for Marcus Stoinis in the first and third matches where he shared the new ball with Mitchell Starc, the first time in his career he had done so. With Cameron Green ill for the decider he became one of the three pace bowlers and conceded less than five an over.Since last year, Australia have been experimenting with their many allrounders, meaning a batter has sometimes been at No. 8, with an eye on it being a potential World Cup plan. If Stoinis can be relied upon for 10 overs when needed – both in terms of his form and body – it makes it a more viable option.1:08

Tait: Agar discussions were the strangest part of this tour

In terms of the specialist bowlers, Starc and Adam Zampa showed their importance to the one-day side and are the two figures the rest of the attack is built around.ODI captain Pat Cummins missed the series following the death of his mother. Steven Smith again earned plaudits for his stand-in role, especially in the final game during which R Ashwin tweeted, “Steve Smith and captaincy is a match made in heaven”, but barring a major backflip Cummins will lead at the World Cup and partner Starc as the frontline quicks.Is Marnus Labuschagne under pressure in ODIs?It leaves Josh Hazlewood potentially struggling to find a place in the starting XI. He is due to return to action in the IPL with Royal Challengers Bangalore after flying home from the Test tour with an Achilles injury. For Hazlewood, the first priority will be getting himself right for the World Test Championship final and Ashes.Glenn Maxwell only featured in the first ODI after which he felt the effects from the badly broken leg he suffered in November. He is also at RCB and will hope T20 is a more manageable workload.Marcus Stoinis shared the new ball with Mitchell Starc in two of the three games•BCCIMarnus Labuschagne was used at No. 4 and No. 5 across the two innings he played and remains the most vulnerable of the frontline batters amid the push for the allrounders.In the bowling, Sean Abbott impressed across all three games while Nathan Ellis was excellent in his one outing. It will be a squeeze, however, for both to find World Cup spots.Ashton Agar gave a show of his character in the decider in what was his first appearance of a tour which saw him head home midway through the Test series. His 2 for 41 was a vital part of Australia’s victory as he removed Virat Kohli and Suryakumar Yadav in consecutive balls. “Ashton Agar changed the game,” Zampa said after being named Player of the Match. “I don’t think I deserve this tonight.”Australia have another ODI series against South Africa in late August before they will need to name their World Cup squad, albeit conditions in a Highveld winter will be a vast difference to what they will face in October and November. There are then more matches against India which act as warm-ups before the tournament – it will be fascinating to see how the team compares to the one that has just won a series.

Supercharged season one prompts MLC's organisers to dream bigger

Home and away fixtures? A 34,000-seater stadium in New York? If the league can build on the momentum it has already generated, why not?

Peter Della Penna02-Aug-2023When considering that USA’s first home ODI in September 2019 only drew 19 people, that too for games staged in the country’s only ICC-accredited venue at the time, in Florida, the bar of expectations couldn’t have been set lower for what constitutes success when it comes to getting fans to turn out for a domestic cricket event in the USA. In a sense, the only way to go was up when starting from that foundation.That’s all the more reason why the events of the last three weeks, in which the first season of the Major League Cricket T20 franchise tournament routinely played to sold-out venues in North Carolina and Texas, were all the more startling. What many people, including the organisers themselves, thought might take several seasons to gain momentum in terms of fan attendance and player buy-in wound up being more supercharged than a case of Red Bull in season one.Related

  • Dallas dreams of cricket

  • MLC projected to spend $110 million on facilities ahead of 2023 launch

  • Can cricket's American dream become a reality?

  • Texas brings the vibe and welcomes franchise cricket to America

  • Cricket through the eyes of two baseball fans in America

“My thought was we’ll start slow, we’ll get some fans in, we’ll entertain them, we’ll put out a good product, and then we’ll build upon it year on year,” MLC co-founder Sameer Mehta told ESPNcricinfo after the conclusion of the tournament final in Texas. “I feel like we’ve skipped a couple of years now in our journey and we can start doing the things now which we’d be doing two years from now.”According to MLC tournament director Justin Geale, league officials were counting on the opening night and the final to be sold out, but had no expectations as to everything in between, particularly from the seven match days in Grand Prairie, Texas. What unfolded was way beyond his cautiously optimistic expectations. On average, Grand Prairie Stadium wound up playing to more than 80% capacity across the nine match dates held at the 7,200-capacity venue, while the six-day slate of fixtures at the 3,000-capacity Church Street Park in Morrisville, North Carolina, all sold out. It meant that more than 70,000 fans – generating $2.8 million in ticket sales revenue – came through the gates to watch season one of MLC, a staggering number for any matches on US soil not involving India’s routine visits to Lauderhill to play T20Is against the West Indies.The Texas Super Kings were by far the best-supported franchise in year one, with all their home games selling out•SportzpicsPerhaps the most remarkable part of all of this is that these numbers were possible in spite of dismal attendances for the three afternoon games held as part of scheduled double-headers at Grand Prairie Stadium, which were shoehorned into the calendar in spite of the oppressive daytime heat – temperatures regularly hovered over 110 degrees Fahrenheit (mid 40s Celsius) – in order to squeeze the tournament into a tight window following the end of the World Cup Qualifier in Zimbabwe and before the start of the Hundred in England. Addressing that is a key priority heading into season two.Two solutions have been floated by MLC officials, either moving the afternoon match back to an early-morning start on days where two matches need to be played, or scheduling double-headers in different cities on the same day, one in the east coast time zone in the late afternoon or early evening before coming back to Texas for a 7:30 or 8 pm start. The fact that a split-venue double-header is even plausible despite the added broadcast production costs – one source tabbed it at a minimum of $350,000 – shows how supercharged the plans are for season two just days after the conclusion of season one.Now that MLC officials have the proof of concept that they can sell out a 7,200-seat venue multiple times in the space of a week, they aren’t holding back with bigger-picture ambitions. Among those is a goal to “piggyback” off the proposed plan put forward by the ICC last week to have a 34,000-seat pop-up venue in New York City at Van Cortlandt Park in the Bronx. If that proposal gets greenlit by NYC officials for the ICC to proceed with as one of three venues in the USA when it co-hosts the 2024 ICC Men’s T20 World Cup, Mehta says he is already in discussions to make it the home venue for reigning champions MI New York in MLC season two next July, immediately after the T20 World Cup final scheduled for June 30.”That would be very very desirable for us and we have indicated as much to the ICC,” Mehta said. “We’d love to collaborate with them not just on venues, but also in marketing and other aspects. If 2024 is going to be a watershed year for both MLC and the ICC, from our perspective a longer season and a much more impactful season and a season where we have some time and space to properly market and properly showcase the product. From the ICC’s perspective, the World Cup is a huge event. So we’d just love to collaborate with them on venues and marketing and a few other elements. And they’ve indicated a reciprocal desire to want to make sure that we utilise next summer to completely evangelise the sport here.”The crowds that poured in to watch season one far exceeded MLC Tournament Director Justin Geale’s (middle) pre-tournament expectations•Peter Della PennaThe Texas Super Kings were by far the best-supported franchise in year one, with all their home games selling out. But the sold-out final – in which an extra 800 standing-room-only tickets were put on sale in the 48 hours before play began, to expand capacity by another 10% to accommodate a late surge in demand from MI New York fans – highlighted the biggest priority of all for the next few years of the league, according to Mehta. Long-term stadium infrastructure plans are now of paramount importance in the short term if the league is going to not only sustain but build on this year’s success.”We need home and away venues,” Mehta said, alluding to the lowest-attendance match of the season between San Francisco Unicorns and LA Knight Riders at the end of the first week of matches in Texas, which saw approximately 2,500 fans turn out in Grand Prairie. “I think all the team owners saw it clearly. It’s one thing to put it up in a presentation and to raise funds. It’s another thing for team owners to see directly themselves that here’s what happens when you have a home venue, because all American franchise sport is built around home venues and a home-and-away concept.”So they are far more enthusiastic now and now that they’ve seen it firsthand about building home venues and quickly building them. So that’s been the number one benefit of this season. The reception the Texas Super Kings got was frankly something that all the owners had to see for themselves to understand that now they need to put their plans into action very quickly.”There were other teething issues that the league adapted to on the fly during season one. But often they were good problems to have – and certainly not the kind that US cricket administrators have ever thought they’d encounter – such as fans waiting too long in lines to get through the entrance gates. Other fan experience enhancements were added as the season progressed, whether it was a T-shirt-launching cannon shooting freebies into the crowd during breaks in play or free giveaways to fans coming through the gates.The fervour shown by the fans, though, is something money can’t buy. For anyone who thought MLC was going to be a one-and-done afterthought, think again.

What is the greatest bowling performance of all time in Tests?

Is it Hadlee’s 9 for 52? Or Broad’s 8 for 15? Or is it neither of those? A comprehensive rating system reveals all

Anantha Narayanan26-Aug-2023This article is a complete overhaul of the historic and epochal Wisden 100 list of best Test bowling performances released in 2001, and the revised version, called the Red Cherry 25, published on ESPNcricinfo in 2018. During the 22 years since the publication of that first list, there have been many insights, suggestions, data revelations, and a far better understanding of this unique concept has been developed. This new list, called Bowl-100, incorporates many improvements, conceptually, contextually, and in terms of coverage, both in terms of breadth and depth.The basic idea remains the same: a bouquet of the 100 best Test bowling performances ever. It is recommended that any reader who has not gone through my last article, which provided a detailed blueprint for the process by which the Bowl-100 list was generated, does so before reading this article. Otherwise they will not know the base on which these lists are drawn up.Let us now move on to the tables. First, the most important one: the revised Bowl-100 table.

There is possibly a surprise at the top.The South Africa team was returning from the sporting wilderness and playing Australia at the SCG in 1993-94. A poor first-innings score of 169, a deficit of well over 100 runs, and a moderate third innings meant that the strong Australian line-up needed only 117 to win. Fast bowler Fanie de Villiers took the first three wickets and then dismissed the nightwatchman, Tim May. The next day, Allan Donald took three wickets and Australia were reduced to 75 for 8. But Craig McDermott swung hard and Australia looked likely to emerge winners at 110 for 8. At this point, Donald dismissed Damien Martyn and de Villiers dismissed Glenn McGrath with the target a mere stroke away. de Villiers’ performance ticks all the boxes and is deservedly the best ever bowling performance, with 914.9 rating points. His performance was against a strong team, away from home, and while defending a very low target.Next we come to an expected spell and one of more recent vintage. In Nottingham in 2015, England won the toss and put Australia in to bat on a typical English overcast day. What followed was a massacre. David Warner was dismissed by Mark Wood and Peter Nevill by Steven Finn. The other eight wickets were picked up by Stuart Broad – Chris Rogers and Shaun Marsh for 0, Steven Smith for 6, Michael Clarke for 10, Adam Voges for 1. After 57 balls of utter destruction, Broad finished with figures of 8 for 15. A big win against a strong Australia gets him this exalted second position, with 888.8 points. His Wicket-Level-Points (points given for each wicket taking into account batter quality, score and match context) aggregate of 162.2 points is the highest in all Tests.Third place honours a performance that has gone under the radar in almost all bowling discussions, possibly because it was in the third innings. After two 300-plus innings scores, South Africa went to bat in their second innings at The Oval in 1994 with a useful lead of 28 runs. Then fast bowler Devon Malcolm changed the course of the game. Peter Kirsten was dismissed for 1, Gary Kirsten and Hanse Cronje for 0, and the late order was polished off when it showed signs of resistance. Malcolm eventually finished with terrific figures of 9 for 57. His WLP total is 161.6, just behind Broad’s. That bowling performance could have been in vain if the batters had failed, but England ran away comfortable winners, chasing down a target of 204 for the loss of just two wickets. Malcolm’s magnum opus clocks in at 881.2 points.The fourth-placed performance is also a surprise – coming as it does from an allrounder known for the slowest fifty in Test cricket. When England visited the West Indies in 1954, they faced a very strong home batting line-up with the three Ws in full bloom. West Indies batted first in Kingston, expecting to put up a match-winning total. Instead, Trevor Bailey, opening the bowling along with Fred Trueman, ripped the West Indies top order to shreds. Bailey’s 7 for 34 was one of the greatest first-day bowling efforts ever and secures 877.4 points. The dismissal of top-order batters for low scores, the 40-plus batting index, and the away win are the main reasons for Bailey’s high position.Fazal Mahmood helped Pakistan draw their first series in England•PA PhotosWhen I published the Red Cherry 25 list in 2018, Richard Hadlee’s opening-day masterpiece of 9 for 52 in Brisbane took the top spot. In the current analysis, it has moved to No. 5. Hadlee’s nine wickets included the first seven batters and two of the last three wickets. It must be said that the quality of the Australian batters in that match was not all that good, and they were coming off a sub-par run. These two factors might have cost Hadlee some points, but the comfortable away win fetched him 870.0 points.Sixth place is taken by Doug Bracewell for his terrific defence of a decent target in Hobart in 2011-12. This effort is reminiscent of de Villiers’ performance in many ways, except that the target was higher in Bracewell’s case. After the first two wickets were taken by Chris Martin and Trent Boult, Bracewell ran through the very strong home-team line-up. Australia were 199 for 9 when David Warner and Nathan Lyon mounted a strong stand that looked like it would take them home. Then Bracewell dismissed Lyon and New Zealand won by seven runs. Bracewell got 868.2 points for his magnificent spell of 6 for 40.Next up is the first second-innings performance in the top ten – an all-time classic by Tony Greig in Port-of-Spain in April 1974. After England scored 267, the West Indian openers added 110. Pat Pocock took the first two wickets and then Greig took the next eight for 86 runs. This was a very strong West Indian batting side. Greig’s figures fetched him 860.8 points and is the best second-innings performance ever.Another fourth-innings classic appears next – Muthiah Muralidaran’s match-winning spell of 8 for 70 against England at Trent Bridge in 2006. After two matching low totals in the first innings, Sri Lanka batted very well and set England a target of over 300. An opening stand of 84 gave the impression that England were on their way to a win. Then Murali struck, taking seven of the first eight wickets to fall and reducing England to 153 for 9 – they eventually lost by 134 runs. Six of these wickets were for single-digit scores. Murali’s magnificent spell was rewarded with 857.5 points.In ninth place is seamer Fazal Mahmood’s 6 for 46 in the fourth innings at The Oval in 1954. It was a very low-scoring game and Pakistan set a strong English team a target of 168. Mahmood ran through the English batting line-up, dismissing four of the top five batters and claiming key late-order wickets. In 30 magnificent overs, he helped dismiss England for 143 and draw the series. His performance gets 849.7 points. Fazal’s 6 for 53 in the first innings also fetched a good number of points.Glenn McGrath’s spell in the 2005 Lord’s Test is the highest-placed five-for in the list•Hamish Blair/Getty ImagesIn tenth place is the unforgettable defence of 129 in the last innings at Headingley in 1981 by Bob Willis with his magical spell of 8 for 43. This wonderful, single-handed tour de force normally gets overshadowed by Ian Botham’s 149 in the third innings. However, without this spell, Australia would have won comfortably. When Ray Bright and Dennis Lillee carved out a stand of 35 for the ninth wicket, it was Willis who secured the last two wickets in a hurry. His all-time-classic spell gathers 847.0 points.And now, a line on some of the other performances that make up the top 25:- A fourth-innings defence by Abdur Rehman against England in Abu Dhabi in 2011-12 gets a well-deserved 11th place.- Another Broad spell, 6 for 17 in the third innings in Johannesburg in 2015-16. Broad is one of three bowlers with two entries in the top 25, the others being Glenn McGrath and Matthew Hoggard.- In the famous 2005 Ashes series, Australia scored only 190 at Lord’s. Then Glenn McGrath dismissed Marcus Trescothick for 4, Andrew Strauss for 2, Michael Vaughan for 3, Ian Bell for 6, and Andrew Flintoff for 0. This collection of five wickets puts McGrath in 14th place, the highest-placed five-wicket haul.- In 17th place is Bill Voce’s amazing four-wicket spell at the SCG in 1936-37. Voce dismissed Jack Fingleton for 12, and Leo O’Brien, Don Bradman and Stan McCabe all for 0 each. This unbelievable collection of wickets makes this the highest-placed four-wicket haul in Test history.- Following Voce’s performance is Ajit Agarkar’s day in the sun at Adelaide Oval in 2003-04. His 6 for 41 followed Australia’s 556 and India’s reply of 523. Australia were dismissed for 196 and lost the Test.- Lance Gibbs’ 6 for 60 in the last innings at Bourda in 1967-68 is the highest performance in a drawn match.- Curtly Ambrose’s opening-day masterclass of 7 for 25 in Perth in 1992-93 is in 24th position.- McGrath’s effort 8 for 38 at Lord’s in 1997 completes the top 25.Here is the “Bowl-100” Excel file, which contains the top 100.Here is the “Bowl-100 Qualifying Performances” file. This is the list of the 12,606 bowling performances that qualify. These spells have secured either 400 rating points or more, or are of three wickets or more.

The graph above plots the wickets against the Bowl-100 rating points for the top 25 performances. Three of the top 25 are four- or five-wicket hauls. There are no fewer than eight six-wicket performances, but only two nine-wicket performances. Not one of the three ten-wicket spells in Test cricket has found its place in the top 25. The sheer range of wickets – four to nine – is a clear indication that the Bowl-100 recognition is very fair and is spread across the wicket ranges. Interestingly, the rating points for Ambrose and Matthew Hoggard’s Christchurch 2002 performance are identical, as are those of Saeed Ajmal and Gibbs, are identical.Anantha NarayananDisplayed here are the top five performances in each innings. It is easy to dispose of the fourth innings: all five performances from that innings have already been covered since these are in the top ten of the top-25 table.Similarly, three of the top first-innings performances have already been described. The other two are Peter Lever’s first-day spell of 6 for 38 in Melbourne in 1974-75 (he took four of the top five batters for a total of two runs), and Saeed Ajmal’s 7 for 55 in Dubai against England in 2011-12.When we move to the second innings, Greig’s Port-of-Spain performance has been featured, and I have already talked about McGrath’s and Voce’s spells at Lord’s and the SCG respectively. Then come Hoggard’s Christchurch spell of 7 for 63 and Fred Trueman 5 for 35 in Port-of-Spain in 1959-60.Finally, we move on to the third innings. Malcolm’s mid-Test match-winning spell, Broad’s Wanderers efforts, and the amazing Agarkar spell have already been described. The other two places have been taken by Mohammad Asif’s Kandy demolition job of 5 for 27, and Botham’s 7 for 48 in the Jubilee Test in Bombay in 1979-80.

Just look at the collection of top performances in drawn matches. As I have already explained, it is difficult for a bowler to put in an effort that’s responsible for drawing a match, unlike for batters. As such, we have to look, in general, for good performances in drawn matches. We have already mentioned Gibbs’ valiant effort in Georgetown.Norman Cowans helped England draw the 1983-84 Lahore Test with 5 for 42. Sikandar Bakht took 8 for 69 in Delhi in 1979-80 to dismiss India for 126 and give Pakistan a 147-run lead. McGrath’s opening-day salvo against England at Lord’s in 1997 wasn’t enough to help Australia win a rain-affected match. Wes Hall is recognised for his lion-hearted efforts in the Brisbane tie in 1960-61.In Durban in 1949-50, Hugh Tayfield’s magnificent 7 for 23 was trumped by Neil Harvey’s superb 151, a Bat-100 top-ten performance. Nathan Lyon’s opening-day effort of 8 for 50 in Bengaluru in 2016-17 was in vain because of R Ashwin’s unplayable spell on the last day. Similarly, Ravi Ratnayeke’s 8 for 83 could not make up for Sri Lanka’s twin batting failures in Sialkot in 1985-86.An interesting presence in the lost-matches sub-category is Kagiso Rabada’s performance in last year’s Brisbane Test. Australia needed only 34 to win and Rabada’s 4 for 13 in that innings gets high rating points. Some might say that the diluted context does not warrant such a high rating, but a deeper look reveals more. I watched the match and I can honestly say that I have never seen the Australians so nervous and jittery. Another 30 or 40 runs more to chase might have resulted in one of the greatest upsets of all time. Rabada was bowling like a man possessed and scoring even a run was difficult. There were 19 extras. Against a very strong, high-flying Australia, away, four top wickets in 24 balls, defending 34 runs – I think Rabada deserves all those points for converting a totally hopeless situation into something that gave the opponents a real fright. It reminded me of Nathan Astle’s Christchurch classic.

This table is divided into two: one based on the absolute rating points, and the other based on the average rating points per wicket. McGrath’s 5 for 53, already featured, leads the ratings-points table with 844.4 points. Asif’s 5 for 27 in Kandy is in second place. After conceding a near-100-run lead, Pakistan destroyed Sri Lanka thanks to a devastating Asif burst in which he took five of the top six wickets for virtually nothing, leading to a comfortable Pakistan win. In third place is Voce’s famous spell, followed by Trueman’s incisive five-wicket haul in Port-of-Spain in 1959-60. In fifth place is Cowans’ very effective five-wicket burst in Lahore.Voce is the only bowler to exceed 200 rating points per wicket. Next comes Iqbal Qasim’s four-wicket haul in Bangalore in Sunil Gavaskar’s farewell Test in March 1987. Close behind comes Henry Olonga’s top-order destruction of the Pakistani batters in a memorable away win in Peshawar in 1998-99.

This table lists matches in which bowlers lit up the stage in both innings. These are the bowlers who secured the highest Bowl-100 rating points in a match. It is not a surprise that Greig’s 8 for 86 and 5 for 70 in Port-of-Spain head the table. Both are Bowl-100 performances and secured a massive 1662 points in total. Similarly Mahmood’s 6 for 53 and 6 for 46 at The Oval in 1954 are both Bowl-100 performances and secured a total of 1640 points. Next comes Jim Laker’s 19-wicket performances. The 9 for 37 was a Bowl-100 performance while the 10 for 53 just missed it. His total is 1583 points. This is followed by Alec Bedser’s two seven-wicket hauls at Trent Bridge in the 1953 Ashes series. Finally, appropriately, to round off, we have de Villiers’ Bowl-100-topping performance supported by his 4 for 80 in the first innings. The match total for de Villiers was 1577 points.

The table above is self-explanatory. The eight top performances that lead the featured teams are McGrath’s 5 for 53, Broad’s 8 for 15, Agarkar’s 6 for 41, Fazal’s 6 for 46, Gibbs’ 6 for 60, de Villiers’ 6 for 43, Hadlee’s 9 for 52, and Murali’s 8 for 70. All these bowling performances are in the top-25 table.Anantha NarayananNow we move on to some classifications of the top-100 innings. Three performances each by Mahmood and Vernon Philander feature in the Bowl-100.The four innings have been well represented, with the decisive fourth innings slightly ahead. Three losses and 15 draws are part of the Bowl-100.Many more away performances, understandably, have been selected, as opposed to home ones.About a third of the 100 performances come from the past two decades.No fewer than 23 five- and four-wicket hauls have been picked.Only seven nine-wicket hauls make their way in.Understandably, fast bowlers account for nearly three-fourths of the entries.

I have added a new table for Bowl-100 in which I aggregate the Bowl-100 points for all the performances by a single player and divide the same by the number of Tests played. This table is ordered on the average rating points per match. The criteria are that the bowler should have taken 100 wickets and played 20 or more Tests.It should not surprise anyone that England’s legendary pre-war bowler Sydney Barnes leads this table. His high-level consistency and an almost totally failure-free record is reflected in the high average of just over 820 points per match. He is over 50 points per match ahead of the next-placed bowler, Saeed Ajmal, whose presence too is well deserved, reflecting an excellent career. And who can complain about Murali in third position? He averages over 750 points – that too in 133 Tests. I doubt whether any words will be enough for this level of sustained performance across these many Tests.In fourth place is Asif, with an average of 742 across only 23 matches. Then we see the two Australian spin greats, Clarrie Grimmett and Bill O’Reilly, with almost 740-level averages. Then comes Lillee, the great Australian fast bowler, and a well-deserved place for offspinner Ashwin, with around 720 points. The top ten is rounded off by Colin Croft and McGrath. The average rating points per wicket is given as an additional insight.Potpourri- Among the grounds, Lord’s has nine Bowl-100 performances. Melbourne, The Oval, and Trent Bridge have seven each, while Port-of-Spain has six.- Twenty-nine of these bowling classics have occurred in England, 22 in Australia and 15 in India.- There were five performances in 1998, the most in any calendar year. The year 1954 had four performances.- The Mean of the Bowl-100 performances is 809.7. The Median performance is 804.2. This indicates a reasonably balanced distribution. The last-placed performance in Bowl-100 is clocked at around 776 points.- In the England-West Indies match in Port-of-Spain in 1973-74, Greig had two bowling performances that exceeded 800 rating points. This is the only such instance. Laker, Mahmood, Massie, and Asif had one performance exceeding 800 and the other exceeding 700 points in a match.- In eight innings there were two performances exceeding 700 points.- In four matches, there were three performances exceeding 700 points: the Ashes Test at the SCG in 1946-47, the 1986-87 India-Pakistan Test in Bangalore, the Ashes Test at The Oval in 1997, and the Pakistan-Australia Test in Lahore in March 2022.- Finally, a combined feat. There have been both Bat-100 and Bowl-100 performances in nine Tests. However, only in two matches have there been Bat-100 and Bowl-100 performances exceeding 800 rating points. In Durban in 1949-50, Harvey secured 836 points for his match-winning innings, and Tayfield secured 805 points for his seven wickets. It was unfortunate that Tayfield finished on the losing side. Similarly at Headingley in 1981, Botham secured 827 points and Willis, 847 points. Both were in a winning cause.A concluding note on the responses. If a reader makes a query about one or more bowling performances without digging deep and understanding the performance well, it is quite unlikely that I will respond to them. If required, please refer to the previous article to understand how the rating points are calculated. It is possible that the reader many have watched an innspell and think it is great but it has to pass quite a few other, more stringent, criteria.Talking Cricket Group
Any reader who wishes to join my general-purpose cricket-ideas-exchange group of this name can email me a request for inclusion, providing their name, place of residence, and what they do.Email me your comments and I will respond. This email id is to be used only for sending in comments. Please note that readers whose emails are derogatory to the author or any player will be permanently blocked from sending in any feedback in future.

Business as usual? Contrasting histories prompt different semi-final views for SA, Australia

Bavuma says “there’s been an acknowledgement of the emotions” involved, while “keeping it pretty chilled is the way to go” for Cummins and Co

Andrew Fidel Fernando15-Nov-202313:33

Steyn: If South Africa win the semi-final, they can go on and dominate the final

“There’s a couple of different ways you can go about it – you can either build it up as the most important game of your life.”Or you can treat it as business as usual.”If anyone else but an Australia captain had said those lines ahead of a major semi-final, you wouldn’t believe them. Surely, the sense of occasion gets to you, right? No matter how much sportstalk you do about it being “just another game” and “needing to start from scratch”, and the “past being the past”, players, being human, must know that they are competing for something truly momentous.Australia may be the exception, though, because to say they are a side that have form in knockouts, have pedigree in global tournaments, just straight up know what they are about when it comes to big matches, is underselling. They have not only won five of this particular kind of trophy before, they are the reigning World Test Champions, and won the T20 World Cup as recently as 2021.Related

In-form South Africa face serial winners Australia with history on their shoulders

SA desperate to lift the trophy but accept there is 'no dishonour in losing'

Temba Bavuma on semi-final availability: 'I'm quite confident but it's not a unilateral decision'

In fact, five of the likely Australia XI for Thursday’s semi-final played in the 2015 World Cup final, which Australia of course won (those five: David Warner, Steven Smith, Glenn Maxwell, Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood). Captain Pat Cummins was merely in the squad for that match, but did play in the T20 World Cup win, alongside many others who will play against South Africa.”We feel lucky a lot of our players have been in these situations quite a bit,” Cummins said. “You know what it takes, but you’re not really weighed down by history. You’re more excited about the challenge.You just get stuck into what needs to be done.”I think we’ve experienced that keeping it pretty chilled and ‘business as usual’ is the way to go for our group. You draw back on those past wins, but you also draw back on the past few weeks and know that us at our best is good enough. You don’t need to try and push it too hard. There’s a quiet confidence. I think our team plays our best when it’s got that.”The comparison couldn’t be more stark. South Africa come to this contest with a history of having being perceived to have slipped up when knockout matches have been tight. The most famous of those screw-ups of course came against Australia in 1999 – a match that is now and quite a distance removed from any of the players in this game.History beckons for Temba Bavuma and Co•ICC/Getty ImagesBut then there was also South Africa having lost from a favourable position in the semi-final against New Zealand in the 2015 World Cup, their fielding performance beset by crucial errors towards the end of that game.They are, as a result, choosing to tackle their fears. Captain Temba Bavuma revealed on the eve of the match that the team had addressed anxieties collectively.”There’s been an acknowledgement of the emotions,” he said. “I don’t think you can deny or run away from that, but there’s also been I guess solutions or mechanisms that have been given as to how to deal with that anxiety if you feel that it overwhelms yourself. And I think that advice also flows to the senior players. I think there’s only two guys in this group that have gone into a semi-final, Quinton de Kock and David Miller, so there’s not a lot of experience from all the other guys.”This is Bavuma’s third ICC tournament at the helm, but his first knockout match as captain. As with other South Africa leaders, he’s trying to strike the right balance between noting the enormity of the game, while trying to keep himself on an even keel.”The game will be massive. I’ve tried not to really allow myself to get into that space. You want to treat it as just another game. I guess you’re forcing me to acknowledge the occasion. It’s something that I’m looking forward to. It’s something that I’ll savour in the moment. I know it will mean a lot for the family and people back home.”

T20 vs Tests: New year begins with a new reality for South Africa

The global reaction to CSA prioritising the SA20 over the Test tour of New Zealand has been strong, but it may have been the right move for cricket in South Africa

Firdose Moonda02-Jan-2024Two former Australia captains have questioned whether South Africa’s decision to send a makeshift Test squad to New Zealand creates a fork in the road for the future of the format. A former South African captain is already on one of those paths, which maybe tells us all we need to know.While Steve Waugh and Michael Clarke stress the primacy of Test cricket, Graeme Smith, who played 117 Tests himself, is the commissioner of the SA20, the tournament that South Africa’s Test regulars will play instead of touring New Zealand. Essentially, that is the issue that has sparked conversations around Test cricket in the first few days of 2024 and it isn’t as clear cut as either side may make it seem.To recap: Cricket South Africa (CSA) launched a T20 tournament with six teams owned by IPL-franchise owners in partnership with private broadcaster SuperSport last year. It followed two failed attempts at launching a T20 league aimed at securing financial sustainability for cricket in South Africa. The agreed window for the SA20 begins the week after the New Year’s Test and ends in early February. Like most such tournaments around the world, it aimed to grab headlines through big-name players. And because CSA is the tournament’s majority shareholder, it could decide that its centrally-contracted players should play the SA20 ahead of anything else. Even South Africa’s international fixtures.Last year, South Africa forfeited an ODI Super League series in Australia that counted towards World Cup qualification to launch the SA20 with its best players. This year, CSA is honouring its bilateral commitments and sending a Test squad to New Zealand while the SA20 is on, but with a new captain and potentially seven debutants. Cue the hand-wringing from Waugh and Clarke over the future of Test cricket.Related

  • Test cricket is increasingly a game of two levels: the Big Three and the Next Six

  • Underdog tag a 'motivation' for new-look South Africa's captain Brand

  • India, Australia and England boards should do more for Test cricket – Johnny Grave

  • No SA20 without South Africa's best – du Plessis and Markram okay with new reality

  • Shukri Conrad: 'If SA20 doesn't happen, we are not going to have Test cricket anyway'

It’s not that CSA – or South Africans – don’t care about Test cricket. The Boxing Day and New Year Test vibes are evidence of that. This country has pitches that produce some of the most exciting contests, always fields a competitive team, cheered on by a diverse fan base. But Test cricket can’t pay CSA’s bills or player salaries and the board has had to find other ways to make money to keep up with other countries raking it in through T20 leagues.But CSA’s own administration – not the current one, which is an important caveat – is also responsible for the problems it faces. Former CEO Thabang Moroe, who was fired for serious misconduct in August 2020 almost ran the organisation into the ground by alienating the South African Cricketers’ Association (SACA), misusing funds, and losing sponsors. CSA is still recovering and the SA20, which turned a profit in its first season, four years ahead of schedule, is a crucial part of that. And so CSA can’t be blamed for prioritising and asking its best players to play the SA20. But we can ask why the board agreed to a tour of New Zealand at the same time as the SA20.CSA announced its plans for a T20 league in April 2022, while the 2023-2027 FTP was released in August 2022. In a statement issued today, CSA said “the window for the SA20 had not been determined at that stage.” Some sources dispute this but CSA insists that “once it became apparent that there would be a clash, we made every effort to find another mutually suitable time-slot for this two-Test series in consultation with New Zealand Cricket.”CSA did make space in the SA20 schedule for a home ODI series against England last year, so did it do enough to try and create a window for the Tests in New Zealand? Insiders have revealed that because South Africa agreed to tour New Zealand when Covid-19 restrictions were still in force, they were expecting a little quid pro quo and asked for the Tests to be played later in February. New Zealand Cricket (NZC) said no because they were scheduled to host Australia, after which players would have to leave for the IPL. CSA then asked for the New Zealand Tests to take place during the IPL, which would have left both teams depleted, but NZC declined. CSA finally asked NZC to move the Tests to 2025 but the only gap New Zealand have is from March, which is close to IPL territory once again. So with no room in the calendar, the upshot is that South Africa are sending a depleted squad to New Zealand.The SA20 is vital to CSA’s finances•SA20Has anyone asked New Zealand what they make of all this? In July last year, NZC said the agreed dates were not negotiable and that it considered South Africa a “popular and formidable Test team” and “an important part” of the summer schedule. After seeing South Africa’s depleted squad, it remains to be seen whether they still think so, and more importantly whether the broadcasters and corporate sponsors of the series still think so. But that’s not what Waugh and Clarke are worried about.Waugh said in a post on Instagram that “history and tradition must count for something,” and that “if we stand by and allow profits to be the defining criteria the legacy of Bradman, Grace and Sobers will be irrelevant,” which is easier to say in Australia, whose players are well paid. Some Australian players even skip IPL seasons because they can afford to but we’ll use that tournament to help illustrate the financial picture: one US dollar is about 1.48 Australian dollars at today’s exchange rate, but about 18.54 South African rands. So while Mitchell Starc’s record IPL deal of INR 24.75 crore (USD 2.98 million approximately) is hardly small change in Australia at around 4.38 million dollars, it would be stupendous in South Africa at more than 55 million rands. So even South Africans with smaller contracts at the IPL, CPL, Hundred, BPL and PSL are making big money away from home, and that reinforces why CSA had to create and prioritise the SA20.But is money all that matters? Not to everyone. Rookie batter David Bedingham withdrew from the SA20 draft – he could because he doesn’t have a CSA contract – so that he could tour New Zealand but he is one of very few. Most South African players could not do what he did and it seems they are resigned to their T20 fate even though some see Test cricket as valuable.Dean Elgar, South Africa’s stand-in captain for the New Year’s Test against India, doesn’t have an SA20 deal and will retire from Test cricket this week. “Speaking to the guys in the changeroom, especially the younger guys, they still very much live for this format [Test cricket],” Elgar said, but the situation is “out of the players hands, it’s out of our coaches hands, and team management’s hands.” He said it was “a little bit sad that it has gone in that direction.”David Bedingham is one of few first-choice Test players who will be touring New Zealand•AFP/Getty ImagesBut Elgar also remembers that when CSA gave its players a choice in 2022, all of them sacrificed playing Tests against Bangladesh to get to the IPL on time. He was critical of the players then and even questioned their loyalty. Now, with his international career ending, Elgar hopes things will change but accepts there’s little he can do about it. “The future is not in my hands. The future is up to administrators making right decisions for players and longevity of format, especially our Test format,” he said. “I would like to see younger guys coming through and experiencing what I have experienced over 12 years. It would be sad to see us play two-Test series. For me, that’s not a fitting way for those guys to learn about this format.”So who pulls the strings? Is it, as Waugh suggested, the ICC along with the boards of India, England and Australia? And should they create a “premium, equal match fee” for all Test players? Australian opener Usman Khawaja supported the idea, but when India captain Rohit Sharma was asked on the eve of the New Year’s Test in Cape Town whether the BCCI has a responsibility to protect Test cricket, he seemed to agree but then indicated the responsibility had to be shared. “I think so. Absolutely,” he said at first, before continuing. “Test cricket is something that we all have to protect and give importance to. It’s just not one or two countries’ responsibility. It’s all the nations who are playing. It’s their responsibility to make sure that we keep it entertaining. It’s everyone’s duty to make sure that it stays nice and healthy and it stays competitive.”Rohit comes from a position of privilege because India don’t have to compete with T20 leagues to field their best Test team. They don’t play international cricket during the IPL and their players don’t play any other leagues. “Luckily we don’t have those kinds of problems to deal with,” Rohit said with a telling smile.Instead, it was another former South African captain who juggled answers about a game he will soon no longer play but, in his words, will always love. “As long as I am around, I am going to be a Test fanatic,” Elgar said. “A lot of our guys are Test fanatics but opportunities need to come our way, otherwise the conversations are just going to be continuous and you are never going to put it to bed. We are just players and we can fight as much as we can but it’s up to the powers that be to make the right calls for us.”Except no-one really knows what the right call is.

Aussies at the IPL: Marsh's hamstring concern, Maxwell and Green struggle

As the IPL starts to take shape, here’s a recap of the main storylines involving the Australians

Alex Malcolm08-Apr-20241:10

Will Mitch Marsh be dropped?

Marsh’s hamstring concernMitchell Marsh is set to be confirmed as Australia’s T20I captain for the World Cup but there is a major concern over his fitness after he missed Delhi Capitals’ loss to Mumbai Indians on Sunday with a hamstring injury. Capitals’ assistant coach Pravin Amre called it a “worrying sign” for Capitals but it is a greater concern for Australia given his injury history.”He has gone for a scan and the physios will give us a report in a week’s time,” Amre said. “Then we will come to know what the exact situation is. Whether he can [play the entire season] or not depends on the reports.”Related

Hamstring injury rules Delhi Capitals' Mitchell Marsh out for at least a week

The curious case of RCB's struggling overseas batters

Maxwell on Mayank: You don't often see someone of his pace

Starc: 'Personal stuff aside, the team's start has been fantastic'

Cricket Australia’s medical staff will be kept in the loop but there is no indication yet of whether he would be withdrawn from the IPL to rest for the World Cup. Marsh has been very carefully managed by CA over the last 12 months since returning to being a three-format player, culminating in being named Allan Border Medallist as Australia’s best-performed player in all forms over the last year.His form prior to the injury was a concern for Capitals with talk of his place being in jeopardy after scores of 20, 23, 18 and 0. But his performances would not have concerned Australia’s selectors given he has still been making fast starts without going on with it. He is playing the style of cricket Australia’s hierarchy will want him to play in the powerplay during the World Cup.Maxwell and Green struggling at Royal Challengers Bengaluru2:19

Moody: Both Green and Maxwell are under pressure

Glenn Maxwell and Cameron Green have both had tough starts to the IPL at Royal Challengers Bengaluru and their form has had an impact on the team’s performances as a whole. Maxwell has scores of 0, 3, 28, 0, and 1.In the last match against Rajasthan Royals, he walked out in a situation set-up for a Maxwell masterclass but was cleaned bowled backing away. Opposing teams have used high pace against him early with great success, which will be a theme he will see a lot of heading to the World Cup. He told ESPN’s that he has had trouble adjusting to Bengaluru’s two-paced pitch. Maxwell has bowled very well in the two matches he has been used. He credited work with RCB assistant coach and current Victoria bowling coach, Adam Griffith in helping him get more overspin and bounce which has yielded four wickets at an economy rate of 7.37.Glenn Maxwell is having a lean time at the IPL•ESPNcricinfo LtdWhile Maxwell’s form will not concern Australia’s selectors, Green’s form is not helping his bid to make the T20 World Cup squad. He was already on the fringes of the final 15 for the tournament but he has been unable to make a statement in a new role for RCB. Having had an excellent debut season for Mumbai Indians last year batting at No. 3, and having had some brief T20I success as an opener, Green is struggling to find his feet at No. 5 with scores of just 9 and 5 not out in the last week. He lost his off stump to the pace of Mayank Yadav and then had no impact at the death against Rajasthan, unable to find the boundary in six balls faced.His best innings of the tournament so far came at No. 3 against Kolkata Knight Riders where he made 33 off 21. In his three innings at No. 5 he has struck at under 100 across 37 balls. He has also struggled to make an impact with the ball. He did take two wickets in the first match of the tournament but has gone wicketless since. Green did not play any T20 cricket at any level between last year’s IPL and this one as Australia’s selectors kept him focussed on red-ball cricket. That lack of exposure may play against him when the selectors sit down to pick the final World Cup 15 later this month unless he can find some form for RCB.Stoinis and David power up2:21

Why Stoinis came in to bat before Pooran

While Maxwell’s out of runs, Australia will be pleased by the performances of Marcus Stoinis and Tim David for their respective teams on Sunday. Stoinis muscled a match-winning 58 from 43 balls in Lucknow Super Giants’ low-scoring win over Gujarat Titans while David clubbed 45 not out off 21 balls in Mumbai’s mauling of Capitals.The form of Stoinis will especially please Australia’s selectors. He was promoted to No. 4 with LSG having lost momentum outside the powerplay and picked his moments to attack to give them a winning score to defend on a surface that became slower throughout. He also played an important hand in the previous win for LSG making 24 off 15 against RCB. He took a wicket in that game but has strangely only bowled one over for the tournament. He was subbed out after his half-century against Titans.David’s start to the tournament had been very unusual. He was demoted to bat behind legspinner Piyush Chawla in Mumbai’s previous game against Royals. But he was back at No. 6 against Delhi and smashed four sixes as he and Romario Shepherd ransacked 42 from the last eight balls of the innings as Mumbai finally broke their season drought.Mitchell Starc was finally among the wickets in IPL 2024•BCCIStarc bounces back, Cummins keeps on keeping onMitchell Starc’s expensive start to the IPL after his expensive auction purchase had raised some eyebrows but he fought back last week with wickets against Capitals. He claimed 2 for 25 from three overs including the scalp of Australia team-mate David Warner who chopped on the ball after smashing Starc for six over cow corner. Starc was unperturbed by his expensive start to the tournament claiming “a little bit of luck” had gone against him in the first two games.Meanwhile, Pat Cummins is looming as a key man for Australia at the T20 World Cup given he is bowling superbly at the IPL. He produced another frugal display in Sunrisers Hyderabad’s win over Chennai Super Kings including the key wicket of CSK’s form batter Shivam Dube.

Jadeja, the batter – mundane but magnificent

When did Ravindra Jadeja get so good with the bat? You may not have noticed, but it has been a while

Karthik Krishnaswamy22-Feb-20241:11

Manjrekar on the talking points for Ranchi, from India’s perspective

At some point around 2018 or thereabouts, commentators began to notice that Ravindra Jadeja had been contributing consistently with the bat “over the last couple of years”, or “over the last two-three years”. All these couples of years later, they often still use the same words when talking about him.Here’s the thing. Jadeja has averaged over 35 with the bat in eight of the last nine years – including the one we’re in – and over 40 in four of them. Since the start of 2016, he’s scored 2532 runs at an average of 42.91. Of the batters who have scored at least 2000 runs in this period, Jadeja has a better average than: Angelo Mathews, Cheteshwar Pujara, Azhar Ali, David Warner, Tom Latham, Alastair Cook, Quinton de Kock, Faf du Plessis, Dhananjaya de Silva, Hashim Amla, Jonny Bairstow, Ben Stokes…We could go on, but let’s stop at Stokes, because, well, you know why. Stokes, in this period, averages 38.47. He also, of course, has 11 hundreds in this period to Jadeja’s four. There’s a reason why you might assume Stokes is the better batter of the two when you debate who the world’s best allrounder is.Related

  • How Ravindra Jadeja can say no to no-balls

  • Can England keep the series alive against Bumrah-less India?

  • Introducing Jais-ball: contemporary yet timeless

  • How will India replace Jasprit Bumrah in Ranchi?

  • Ben Stokes unfazed by Bazball backlash as England brace to go again

There’s also the matter of Jadeja’s unusually high proportion of not-outs: 19 in 78 innings, nearly one in every four. Compare that to Pujara’s six in 120 innings, or Stokes’ seven in 145.It’s true that Jadeja’s batting record – particularly from 2016 to 2019, when India ran up a lot of massive totals on flat home pitches – is slightly inflated by how many runs he’s scored in declaration innings. But he’s also played match-turning innings on difficult home pitches, averaged over 40 in Australia, and shown the soundness of his defence against swing and seam in England, not least during his 104 at Edgbaston in 2022, when he put on 222 with Rishabh Pant after they came together at 98 for 5.Basically, he’s been bloody good for a long time.But when you watch Jadeja bat, you can kind of see why commentators continue to do the “last couple of years” thing. It may be because his batting is a little, well, unmemorable, in the sense that it’s a little lacking in idiosyncrasy, in shots he plays in a manner that’s his alone, and in stylistic flourishes and unorthodoxies. You wouldn’t call him attractive to watch, but you wouldn’t call him unattractive either.Last week, he walked in at 33 for 3 on his home ground and scored 112. By the end of it, what stuck in the collective memory – judging by discussions in traditional and social media – was his role in running Sarfaraz Khan out in his debut innings, and the nature and timing of his own dismissal, a chipped caught-and-bowled off Joe Root early on day two.This series, Jadeja has mixed attack with good defence•AFP/Getty ImagesIt was, to be fair, that kind of innings. Watching it, you may have found yourself thinking thoughts such as, “Wait, he’s on 31? How did he get here?”You may even have made a comparison with R Ashwin, the Siamese twin Jadeja is entirely unlike. Even in his briefest stays at the crease, Ashwin can play shots that leave a lasting impression: a back-foot drive off Josh Hazlewood in Bengaluru, for instance, the only scoring shot in an innings of 4.Jadeja?It took until he was in his 60s for Jadeja to play a truly Jadeja shot: something that made you go, ah, yes, I’ve seen do before, many times.It was off a short ball from Root, to which he rocked so far back that you feared he’d trample the stumps. From that position, with upper body leaning further back, he played more a shovel than a pull, hitting under the ball rather than across it, launching it over the midwicket boundary. Not immediately pleasing to the eye, but not unpleasing either, with a robust, utilitarian charm. A shot much like the cricketer who played it.

The highlights reel of his Rajkot innings is utterly unremarkable because it’s full of competently executed attacking shots off less-than-good bowling. But it shows you that he’s not attempted to drive balls on the up or sweep them from the line of the stumps, and that he’s survived enough of the good balls to be able to be on strike against the not-so-good ones

On Thursday, the eve of the fourth Test in Ranchi, India batting coach Vikram Rathour gave this insight into Jadeja the batter.”Lately, I think what he’s doing really well is – that has been his strength in bowling as well, that’s the kind of character he has – he keeps everything very simple,” he said. “There is no complication. He is not overthinking, he is not overanalysing anything. He just does what the team requires at that stage, and that goes for his bowling and batting both. That’s the great asset that he has – keeping it really simple and executing his plans.”It was the kind of press-conference reply that may have initially disappointed the questioner – come on, you’re the batting coach; give us something about his technique and gameplans! – before the realisation dawned that this was, pretty much, the heart of it.Jadeja keeps things simple. There’s probably no shot in the book that he’s among the best in the world at executing, and many others have tighter defences. But he does many things well enough to be very good at them at Test level, and he knows his own game better than most.But perhaps the thing most viewers underestimate about Jadeja is how much natural talent he possesses. The simplicity of his methods can give you the illusion of a limited player, but one look at his record should tell you he’s no such thing. Particularly with the ball. There have always been accurate left-arm spinners who’ve bowled quick and attacked the stumps; there have always been left-arm spinners who’ve given the ball a rip; there have always been left-arm spinners who have varied their pace and used the crease cleverly. Jadeja does everything.Jadeja – Great with the bat, amazing with the ball•AFP via Getty ImagesThis is why there was an air of inevitability about his fourth-innings five-for in Rajkot. The areas he was hitting, ball after ball, and the amount of help he was able to extract from them, left England’s batters little choice but to succumb. Why did Ollie Pope try to cut when the cut really wasn’t on? Why did Jonny Bairstow and Root try to sweep when the sweep really wasn’t on? Jadeja was giving them neither the confidence that they could survive him by defending nor any balls they could score off with relative safety. So they simply had to take those chances.Jadeja isn’t quite as good with the bat, relative to his peers, as he is with the ball, but he brings to his batting the same sense of naturalness – has he ever tinkered with his stance? – the same adherence to clear, simple plans, and the same genius for playing the percentages. The highlights reel of his Rajkot innings is utterly unremarkable because it’s full of competently executed attacking shots off less-than-good bowling. But it shows you that he’s not attempted to drive balls on the up or sweep them from the line of the stumps, and that he’s survived enough of the good balls to be able to be on strike against the not-so-good ones.Since September 2018 – when he scored an unbeaten 86 at The Oval that showed him how good he could be, even away from home, if he trusted his defence – he’s gone past the 100-ball mark 15 times in 49 innings. Nearly once every three innings, which is remarkable when you factor in his bowling workload.There’s a ceiling to what Jadeja can do with the bat, of course, and he probably won’t play a lot of high-impact, Stokes-like innings against top attacks that don’t give batters clear-cut scoring opportunities. But this is where the comparisons stop making sense because these are two very different types of allrounder. Jadeja is one of the greats of his type, and he’s been this good for a long, long time.Much longer than a couple of years.

Mominul: 'Our batting has totally collapsed in this series'

Chris Silverwood praises the Sri Lanka quicks for showing “a lot of heart, determination and passion”

Mohammad Isam02-Apr-2024Mominul Haque took the blame for playing a part in Bangladesh not capitalising on a good batting pitch on day four of the second Test against Sri Lanka in Chattogram.Bangladesh had their best batting day of the two-Test series as they crossed 200 for the first time in five Test innings, but a number of batters failed to convert their starts, and they are now staring at a big defeat, reduced to 268 for 7 in a tall chase of 511.Mominul, when on 50 off 55, struck a sweep straight down deep-backward square-leg’s throat minutes before the tea break. Shakib Al Hassan and Litton Das then fell for 36 and 38 respectively, and Shahadat Hossain walked back for 15.Related

  • Disciplined Sri Lanka reap rewards for investment in fast bowling

  • Dinesh Chandimal leaves Chattogram Test for 'family medical emergency'

  • Spinners put Sri Lanka on verge of series sweep

“It was my fault to play that shot in the over before tea,” Mominul said. “I shouldn’t have got out like that. If we had lost two or four wickets all day, it would have been a different story. They [Sri Lanka] would have been under pressure. It would have left us to bat all day on the fifth day. The pitch is still good but we lost too many wickets today. Most of us got out after getting set. All of us, including myself, are to blame.”Sri Lanka head coach Chris Silverwood, however, praised Bangladesh’s forthright approach on the fourth day.”I think Bangladesh played well today,” Silverwood said. “They put the pressure back on the bowlers. They made life difficult for us. I think we bowled well in patches. There were periods when we could have bowled better. I don’t think we quite had the consistency in this innings as we showed in the first innings with the ball. Thankfully, our hard work has put us in a strong position going into tomorrow.”In these sorts of wickets, you need to hold your line and length. Bangladesh didn’t allow us to do that today. The run rate stayed around 3.9, which means they were pushing back. It is a good learning curve for us.”

“We have seen some good skill levels from the boys. They have shown a lot of heart, determination and passion. I think they are learning how to bowl in different conditions”Chris Silverwood on the Sri Lanka fast bowlers

Bangladesh’s top seven in this series have the lowest collective batting average for the side in a series since the start of January 2021. Mominul said that the lack of red-ball cricket in the lead-up to the Test series could be a reason for the poor performance but did not want to use that as an excuse. Bangladesh played their last Test series before this one in December, and their two first-class competitions also ended in December.”Our batting has totally collapsed in this series,” Mominul said. “We can’t give any excuses about it. If you compare it to how we batted in the first Test against New Zealand [in November last year], we couldn’t click in this Test series. We couldn’t play to our capabilities.”You will think I am giving an excuse if I say that we are playing a Test after a considerable break. You might then ask me why I didn’t have a problem [scoring runs when others couldn’t]. I might have tackled it better but the rest of the team were mostly playing white-ball cricket [till recently]. This is the reality. It will sound negative, but this is the truth.”Lahiru Kumara is the second-highest wicket-taker in the series at this stage•AFP/Getty ImagesBangladesh’s batters have found the Sri Lankan fast bowlers especially tough to tackle. With a total of 31 wickets so far, the quicks have taken the most wickets by a Sri Lanka fast bowling attack ever in a two-match Test series. The previous occasions when they took 25-plus wickets were all in Australia, South Africa and England.”I think they have been absolutely fantastic in this series. We have seen some good skill levels from the boys. They have shown a lot of heart, determination and passion. I think they are learning how to bowl in different conditions,” Silverwood said. “We had a completely different style of pitch in the last Test. So we had to change the way we go about things. They adapted very well. They are growing. They have a lot left to learn. They are improving all the time.”Silverwood reserved special praise for Lahiru Kumara, who is making a comeback after a long injury layoff. Kumara has so far taken nine wickets in the series, often troubling the batters with sharp short-of-a-length deliveries.”He [Kumara] has created an impact. He got wickets in important times. He bowled some fantastic deliveries,” Silverwood said. “He has looked dangerous every time he has come into the attack. We want to continue to develop him. I think the more he plays, the better he is going to get.”

Sam Cook: The England Test hopeful with a sub-20 bowling average

The Essex seamer on hat-trick balls, the Kookaburra and managing his England “obsession”

Vithushan Ehantharajah10-Apr-2024Essex’s 254-run victory against Nottinghamshire in their Division One opener to the 2024 County Championship was the third time Sam Cook has pocketed a ball from both innings of a match in 75 first-class appearances. This time, however, he felt a little guilty.”Do you keep a hat-trick ball?” Cook asks, having achieved the feat in the first innings at Trent Bridge. “It’s not the same as a five-for. I’m sure someone will tell me if it’s the done thing or not.”Critch [Matt Critchley] grabbed the hat-trick ball, and I wasn’t sure what the etiquette was; whether to hang on to it. It didn’t quite sit right with me. But I do have both of them.”The hat-trick on day two – dismissing Lyndon James, Brett Hutton and Dillon Pennington in the first over of the second new ball to give him figures of 4 for 59 overall – was followed by 6 for 14 in the Notts second innings. It was Cook’s 13th five-wicket haul and the fourth time he has taken 10 or more in a match. Two of those (Kent in 2019 and Northamptonshire in 2021) featured five-fors in both innings.Related

Bashir set for Somerset recall despite Pretorius arrival

Lancashire hope CA show 'common sense' on Lyon decision

Cook takes hat-trick as Essex defeat Kent

Essex battle back with Cook hat-trick after Clarke ton

Cook 'desperate' for England chance after running through Notts

The novelty of the two balls added to the collection – curated by his mum in a box she keeps in his childhood bedroom – is that they are both Kookaburras. The ECB’s experiment with the Australian ball, starting with the first two rounds of the season before returning later this summer, was a means to identify seamers capable of thriving without relying upon the lavish movement of the Dukes. A quarter of the way into this year’s experiment, Cook has already set himself apart from the rest.”I think the brand-new Kookaburra can sometimes give you more assistance from the seam,” Cook says. “Obviously not for a particularly long period normally, but I found it pretty quickly and managed to maintain that for the whole second innings which was really pleasing.”It feels different in the hand. The seam is completely different – it’s a slightly wider seam. But the most obvious characteristic is it goes softer a lot quicker. I know the Dukes in the last couple of years have tended to go soft, but you still with the Duke expect to get 20 overs out of it in relatively in good shape, depending on conditions. With the Kookaburra I’d say you’re lucky to get 10 overs out of it behaving like a new ball as such.”The thing I’ve noticed with the Kookaburra is you’ve got to be a lot more specific with your seam presentation; it’s got to be a lot more upright. You can’t always get away with bowling big wobble seamers, which you can at times with the Dukes. Seam presentation has got to be pretty spot on to get something out of it.”Cook admits he was shaking off some early season rust in the first innings, but made amends in the second. At one point, he had figures of 5 for 9, with three batters (Haseeb Hameed, Matthew Montgomery and Hutton) bowled, along with Ben Slater caught behind and Calvin Harrison trapped lbw. Dillon Pennington’s edge to first slip was number six.

“I’ve looked at the guys who are similar to my skillset playing international cricket, and I’m operating at the speeds they are. When I’ve played in T20 comps, I know the speed guns tend to be a bit skew-whiff but I’m not bowling at 75mph anymore”

Not that Cook, 26, needed this Dukes-less round to state his case for higher honours. A record of 275 first-class dismissals at 19.48 – 261 for Essex across Division One and the Bob Willis Trophy – and a sub-20 average in each of the last four summers already have Cook on England’s radar.His aptitude with the Kookaburra is informed by the winters with England Lions, along with previous experience in Australian grade cricket. With the blessings of and England selector Luke Wright and recently-departed men’s performance director Mo Bobat, Cook opted against the Lions tour of India at the start of the year for stints in the T10 with Chennai Braves and SA20 with Joburg Super Kings. Nevertheless, breaking into Ben Stokes’ Test side remains his top priority.”I’d still absolutely love to play for England. This winter, I probably appeared to have turned attention more to white-ball [cricket]. But that was more through trying to experience new conditions and playing in South Africa with an eye to playing for England in the future.”What I’ve tried to do, though, my conscious effort since last season, is not become too obssessed with it. I’ve probably become too consumed with the obsession of wanting to play for England and gone away from what I do really well. That’s something I’ve tried to change, more from the fact that I think if I do what I do really well for long enough, that opportunity will come. Just to trust in that and not waver from what’s made me successful in the last few years.”Overriding that is: I’d still love to play for England one day.”Will the call come this summer? Stuart Broad’s retirement, Ollie Robinson’s disappointing India tour, and uncertainty over Josh Tongue’s fitness seemingly present an opportunity for Cook with three Tests each against West Indies and Sri Lanka to come. Though skilful, like Robinson, he is not as tall. And he is not as quick as Tongue, primarily operating in the low eighties. Though he is working to raise his speeds, he acknowledges there is only so much he can do without compromising what has made him so successful.Eyes on the prize: Sam Cook hopes to make his case for a Test cap•Getty Images”I think if anyone had the answer to that question I’d pay them a lot of money,” Cook replies when asked how he would go about adding speed. “I know there’s never going to be an increase of 10mph in my own pace.”But it’s trying to get the most out of what I can physically do, whether it’s been more focus in the gym on power and explosive exercises rather than bulk, heavy weights. It’s moving weights as quick as I can, focus on sprinting, that kind of stuff. I’m trying to maximise the pace side.”Rhythm is a big thing for me. My fastest spells have always been when I’ve been the most controlled, the most in rhythm and everything clicks from there.”I’ve looked at the guys who are similar to my skillset playing international cricket, and I’m operating at the speeds they are. When I’ve played in T20 comps, I know the speed guns tend to be a bit skew-whiff in some of those, but I’m not bowling at 75mph anymore.”For what it is worth, those who have faced Cook recently have noticed a few extra yards. Clips of cartwheeling stumps on social media certainly won’t harm his case. Nor will building on a strong start to the summer.

Essex were the only side across both divisions to emerge with a win from from the opening set of fixtures. Though they are sitting tight for news of a potential 16-point deduction after opener Feroze Khushi’s bat failed an on-field dimensions check on day three, for now at least, the 20 they have accrued puts them comfortably ahead of the Division One pack.Building on last year’s second-place finish, 20 points behind Surrey, looked tricky following Dan Lawrence’s move to the Kia Oval and Alastair Cook’s retirement. But Dean Elgar and Jordan Cox – who scored 80 and 84, respectively, in their debut knocks – already seem adequate replacements in the pursuit of a ninth title.Cook, who has two County Championships to his name, along with 2020’s Bob Willis Trophy, firmly believes Essex can be top of the pile come September. Playing defending champions Surrey twice this campaign, having only done so once in 2023 due to the ham-fisted nature of a 14-game season in a 10-team league, is extra incentive to a team with strong red-ball pedigree.”It’s a real statement that we’re not going away and we want to be keeping up the top there,” Cook says.”To play Surrey twice this year, we’re really excited about it. Partly, that’s another frustration with the schedule – I don’t see how you can have a Division One where you’re not playing everyone twice and not having the best teams against each other twice. [This year] we can show when we go toe-to-toe with them that we’re serious contenders.”

Game
Register
Service
Bonus